Assac Networks ShieldiT for Desktops vs Fortinet FortiClient: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Assac Networks ShieldiT for Desktops

Mid-market and enterprise teams with workforce security concerns around communications interception will find ShieldiT for Desktops valuable; end-to-end encryption for desktop-to-mobile messaging and VoIP tapping protection address a gap most traditional EDRs ignore. The web-based deployment model eliminates the installation friction that kills adoption in security-conscious organizations. This is not the tool if you need behavioral EDR, threat hunting, or incident response capabilities; ShieldiT prioritizes encryption and data confidentiality over detection and response.

Fortinet FortiClient

Mid-market and enterprise security teams already running Fortinet infrastructure will extract real value from FortiClient because the Security Fabric integration eliminates the friction of bolting on a separate endpoint agent; your SOC actually sees correlated signals across network and endpoints instead of managing disconnected consoles. Fortinet's NIST coverage is strongest in the Protect functions (PR.AA, PR.PS, PR.DS) and notably weaker in RS.AN incident analysis, meaning FortiClient prioritizes prevention and detection over forensic investigation. Skip this if your organization runs heterogeneous security stacks or needs best-of-breed EDR; FortiClient's power comes entirely from staying inside the Fortinet ecosystem.