Armis Centrix™ vs Dispel Wicket Industrial Gateway: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing sprawling IoT, OT, and medical device environments will get the most from Armis Centrix™ because its agentless discovery actually works across protocols most tools ignore. The platform covers all four NIST Identify and Detect functions, with particular strength in continuous asset monitoring and vulnerability prioritization that cuts through noise in environments with thousands of unmanaged devices. Not the pick if you need deep forensic analysis or incident response automation; Centrix prioritizes visibility and risk ranking over post-breach investigation. Mid-market and enterprise OT teams managing distributed assets across air-gapped or NATed networks should evaluate Wicket Industrial Gateway for its zero trust remote access that doesn't require internet connectivity at each site; offline mode and Wicket chaining directly address the segmentation patterns of Purdue model deployments. The 65,000+ protocol support and NIST PR.AA coverage for access control reflect a platform built for OT's protocol diversity, not retrofitted from IT tooling. This isn't for buyers primarily concerned with detecting anomalies in operational traffic; Wicket prioritizes secure connectivity and data streaming over continuous monitoring, leaving that burden on downstream analytics layers.

Based on our analysis of core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion: