Antiy PTA-mobile vs Yaraprocessor: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy PTA-mobile is a commercial malware analysis tool by Antiy Labs. Yaraprocessor is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams handling high-volume Android app intake will benefit most from Antiy PTA-mobile's ability to monitor 200+ dynamic behaviors across 26 categories in a single sandbox run, capturing network traffic, file artifacts, and UI state without manual case work. The hybrid deployment model supports both server-based processing for large app batches and portable device carriers for field analysis, making it practical for carriers and regional security ops. Skip this if your organization needs upstream static analysis as a primary control; Antiy's strength is post-deployment behavioral visibility, not catching issues before apps ship.
Incident response teams performing post-breach packet analysis will find Yaraprocessor's dynamic payload scanning invaluable, especially when you need to apply YARA rules across network captures without rebuilding infrastructure. The free pricing and 98 GitHub stars signal active community use and zero licensing friction for resource-constrained security shops. Skip this if your team needs a polished UI or vendor support; Yaraprocessor is a command-line tool that assumes operator familiarity with YARA syntax and packet formats.
