Antiy PTA-mobile vs RTFSig: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy PTA-mobile is a commercial malware analysis tool by Antiy Labs. RTFSig is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams handling high-volume Android app intake will benefit most from Antiy PTA-mobile's ability to monitor 200+ dynamic behaviors across 26 categories in a single sandbox run, capturing network traffic, file artifacts, and UI state without manual case work. The hybrid deployment model supports both server-based processing for large app batches and portable device carriers for field analysis, making it practical for carriers and regional security ops. Skip this if your organization needs upstream static analysis as a primary control; Antiy's strength is post-deployment behavioral visibility, not catching issues before apps ship.
Incident responders and malware analysts who need to quickly triage RTF-based phishing attachments should use RTFSig to extract and fingerprint suspicious structural elements that commodity AV misses. The tool's free, open-source design means zero procurement friction for resource-constrained security teams running limited forensics pipelines. Skip this if you're looking for an automated detection engine; RTFSig is a manual analysis helper that requires operator judgment to interpret signature output, not a fire-and-forget scanning tool.
