Antiy PTA-mobile vs Needle: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy PTA-mobile is a commercial mobile app security tool by Antiy Labs. Needle is a free mobile app security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best mobile app security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams handling high-volume Android app intake will benefit most from Antiy PTA-mobile's ability to monitor 200+ dynamic behaviors across 26 categories in a single sandbox run, capturing network traffic, file artifacts, and UI state without manual case work. The hybrid deployment model supports both server-based processing for large app batches and portable device carriers for field analysis, making it practical for carriers and regional security ops. Skip this if your organization needs upstream static analysis as a primary control; Antiy's strength is post-deployment behavioral visibility, not catching issues before apps ship.
Security teams doing iOS penetration testing on legacy applications will find Needle's modular framework approach valuable for methodical assessment workflows, particularly when testing against iOS 9 and 10 codebases that newer tools have abandoned. The 1,383 GitHub stars reflect sustained adoption among practitioners who need granular control over each assessment phase rather than automated scanning. Skip Needle if you're testing current iOS versions or need active vendor support; the framework was discontinued years ago and Objection has become the maintained alternative for modern iOS security work.
