Antiy PTA-mobile vs Hfinger: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy PTA-mobile is a commercial malware analysis tool by Antiy Labs. Hfinger is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams handling high-volume Android app intake will benefit most from Antiy PTA-mobile's ability to monitor 200+ dynamic behaviors across 26 categories in a single sandbox run, capturing network traffic, file artifacts, and UI state without manual case work. The hybrid deployment model supports both server-based processing for large app batches and portable device carriers for field analysis, making it practical for carriers and regional security ops. Skip this if your organization needs upstream static analysis as a primary control; Antiy's strength is post-deployment behavioral visibility, not catching issues before apps ship.
Incident responders and malware analysts who need to cluster and identify HTTP-based C2 traffic without reverse-engineering every binary should use Hfinger; it fingerprints request patterns to surface infrastructure reuse across campaigns, which speeds triage when you're drowning in packet captures. The tool is free and sits on GitHub with 143 stars, making it trivial to integrate into existing DFIR workflows. Skip it if your team relies on commercial threat intelligence feeds as your primary detection method; Hfinger is a tactical analyst tool, not a replacement for intelligence subscriptions.
