Antiy PTA-mobile vs Enjarify by Google: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy PTA-mobile is a commercial mobile app security tool by Antiy Labs. Enjarify by Google is a free mobile app security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best mobile app security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams handling high-volume Android app intake will benefit most from Antiy PTA-mobile's ability to monitor 200+ dynamic behaviors across 26 categories in a single sandbox run, capturing network traffic, file artifacts, and UI state without manual case work. The hybrid deployment model supports both server-based processing for large app batches and portable device carriers for field analysis, making it practical for carriers and regional security ops. Skip this if your organization needs upstream static analysis as a primary control; Antiy's strength is post-deployment behavioral visibility, not catching issues before apps ship.
Android security researchers and mobile app testers who need to analyze obfuscated or complex APKs will get real value from Enjarify by Google, which converts Dalvik bytecode to Java bytecode and makes reverse-engineering significantly faster than working directly with smali. The 2,746 GitHub stars and continued maintenance by Google signal a tool trusted by professional security teams doing deep application analysis. Skip this if your team lacks reverse-engineering expertise or needs automated vulnerability scanning; Enjarify is a specialist's instrument, not a vulnerability scanner, and requires actual bytecode literacy to deliver results.
