Antiy PTA-mobile vs CFR: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy PTA-mobile is a commercial malware analysis tool by Antiy Labs. CFR is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams handling high-volume Android app intake will benefit most from Antiy PTA-mobile's ability to monitor 200+ dynamic behaviors across 26 categories in a single sandbox run, capturing network traffic, file artifacts, and UI state without manual case work. The hybrid deployment model supports both server-based processing for large app batches and portable device carriers for field analysis, making it practical for carriers and regional security ops. Skip this if your organization needs upstream static analysis as a primary control; Antiy's strength is post-deployment behavioral visibility, not catching issues before apps ship.
Java incident responders and forensic analysts who need to reverse-engineer compiled bytecode will find CFR invaluable; it handles modern Java features up to version 14 that older decompilers choke on, giving you readable source from binaries without guesswork. The tool is free and requires no licensing overhead, making it easy to drop into any malware analysis or post-breach code review workflow. Skip this if your team primarily targets legacy Java 6-8 applications or needs a GUI; CFR is command-line only and optimized for current language syntax.
