Antiy PTA-mobile vs BinaryPig: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy PTA-mobile is a commercial malware analysis tool by Antiy Labs. BinaryPig is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams handling high-volume Android app intake will benefit most from Antiy PTA-mobile's ability to monitor 200+ dynamic behaviors across 26 categories in a single sandbox run, capturing network traffic, file artifacts, and UI state without manual case work. The hybrid deployment model supports both server-based processing for large app batches and portable device carriers for field analysis, making it practical for carriers and regional security ops. Skip this if your organization needs upstream static analysis as a primary control; Antiy's strength is post-deployment behavioral visibility, not catching issues before apps ship.
Incident response teams processing bulk malware samples will find value in BinaryPig's ability to ingest and correlate binaries at scale using Elasticsearch backend indexing. The tool's free, open-source model and 144 GitHub stars indicate active use among forensics practitioners who need fast pivoting across file metadata and behavioral artifacts. Skip this if your team lacks Python fluency or needs guided threat hunting; BinaryPig assumes you're comfortable writing queries against raw malware telemetry, not clicking through a UI.
