Antiy Labs PTA vs chkrootkit: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy Labs PTA is a commercial malware analysis tool by Antiy Labs. chkrootkit is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security operations teams investigating APT incidents will get the most from Antiy Labs PTA because it combines dynamic sandbox execution with static signature detection specifically tuned for advanced threat artifacts, not just commodity malware. The tool covers the full NIST Detect and Respond cycle through continuous monitoring, malware behavior analysis, and forensic-ready incident tracing, with multi-OS sandbox support including Kylin and WPS that matters if your environment isn't purely Windows. Skip this if your priority is integration breadth; Antiy Labs PTA works best as a dedicated threat analysis appliance feeding into your existing infrastructure rather than as a central correlation platform.
Linux administrators managing legacy or air-gapped systems need chkrootkit because it runs entirely offline and requires no agent installation, making it the only viable rootkit detection option when your infrastructure can't phone home. The tool performs over 100 signature-based checks for known rootkit artifacts and kernel-level compromises, catching what file integrity monitoring alone will miss. Skip this if you're running modern EDR across your fleet; chkrootkit prioritizes detection over response and won't integrate with your SOC workflows, making it a one-off forensic tool rather than a continuous monitoring layer.
