Anchore Enforce vs SecLogic Kubernetes Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Anchore Enforce

Mid-market and enterprise security teams operating Kubernetes environments need Anchore Enforce for its policy-as-code enforcement model, which closes the gap between vulnerability scanning and actual compliance gates in the pipeline. Pre-built policy packs for FedRAMP, NIST, and DISA compliance plus runtime monitoring of live clusters means you're covering both ID.AM (asset inventory) and DE.CM (continuous monitoring) without bolting on separate tools. Skip this if your organization lacks the infrastructure-as-code discipline to maintain JSON policies or if you need vulnerability remediation guidance; Anchore Enforce is strict enforcement, not hand-holding.

SecLogic Kubernetes Security

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing multi-cloud Kubernetes environments will benefit most from SecLogic Kubernetes Security's agentless KSPM paired with its attack path mapping across containers and cloud infrastructure. The combination of admission controller enforcement, IaC scanning across Dockerfiles and Terraform, and continuous cluster posture monitoring addresses the full SDLC, with native support for EKS, AKS, and GKE compliance reporting. This tool prioritizes asset discovery and risk assessment over runtime threat detection; if your team needs behavioral anomaly detection for active container exploits, you'll want to layer in a dedicated runtime security platform.