Anchore Enforce vs Grype: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Anchore Enforce is a commercial container security tool by Anchore. Grype is a free container security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best container security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams operating Kubernetes environments need Anchore Enforce for its policy-as-code enforcement model, which closes the gap between vulnerability scanning and actual compliance gates in the pipeline. Pre-built policy packs for FedRAMP, NIST, and DISA compliance plus runtime monitoring of live clusters means you're covering both ID.AM (asset inventory) and DE.CM (continuous monitoring) without bolting on separate tools. Skip this if your organization lacks the infrastructure-as-code discipline to maintain JSON policies or if you need vulnerability remediation guidance; Anchore Enforce is strict enforcement, not hand-holding.
DevOps teams scanning container images in CI/CD pipelines should use Grype because it's free, fast, and integrates directly into build workflows without requiring a separate service or account. With 10,600+ GitHub stars and active maintenance, it's battle-tested across thousands of deployments and handles multiple image formats that competing open-source scanners skip. Skip Grype if your team needs prioritized remediation guidance, supply chain attestation, or integration with a broader vulnerability management platform; it's a scanner, not a risk decisioning tool.
