Anchore Enforce vs Confluera Container Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Anchore Enforce

Mid-market and enterprise security teams operating Kubernetes environments need Anchore Enforce for its policy-as-code enforcement model, which closes the gap between vulnerability scanning and actual compliance gates in the pipeline. Pre-built policy packs for FedRAMP, NIST, and DISA compliance plus runtime monitoring of live clusters means you're covering both ID.AM (asset inventory) and DE.CM (continuous monitoring) without bolting on separate tools. Skip this if your organization lacks the infrastructure-as-code discipline to maintain JSON policies or if you need vulnerability remediation guidance; Anchore Enforce is strict enforcement, not hand-holding.

Confluera Container Security

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing Kubernetes clusters will get the most from Confluera Container Security because its Continuous Attack Graph technology cuts through alert noise by correlating isolated detections into threat chains, reducing false positives by 10x compared to traditional behavioral detection alone. The platform covers DE.CM and DE.AE functions across runtime, lateral movement, and privileged activity, then enables surgical response with process and file-level remediation. Skip this if you need vulnerability scanning at build-time as your primary control; Confluera contextualizes existing CVE data for runtime rather than surfacing new ones.