What features do Anchore Enforce vs Chainguard VMs offer?

**Anchore Enforce** differentiates with Pre-built policy packs for FedRAMP, NIST, DISA, and Docker CIS compliance, Runtime monitoring of Kubernetes clusters and namespaces, License management with copyleft detection. **Chainguard VMs** differentiates with Zero-CVE virtual machine images with continuous rebuilds, CVE remediation SLA: 7 days critical, 14 days high/medium/low, Container Host VMs for ECS, EKS, EC2, GCE, and Azure.

Who makes Anchore Enforce vs Chainguard VMs?

**Anchore Enforce** is developed by Anchore. **Chainguard VMs** is developed by Chainguard. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Anchore Enforce a good alternative to Chainguard VMs?

Anchore Enforce and Chainguard VMs serve similar Container Security use cases: both are Container Security tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Anchore Enforce vs Chainguard VMs (2026) | Compare Container Security Tools

Q: What is the difference between Anchore Enforce vs Chainguard VMs?

**Anchore Enforce**: Policy enforcement & compliance mgmt for container security across SDLC. built by Anchore. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include Pre-built policy packs for FedRAMP, NIST, DISA, and Docker CIS compliance, Runtime monitoring of Kubernetes clusters and namespaces, License management with copyleft detection.. **Chainguard VMs**: Minimal, zero-CVE virtual machine images for container hosts and applications. built by Chainguard. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include Zero-CVE virtual machine images with continuous rebuilds, CVE remediation SLA: 7 days critical, 14 days high/medium/low, Container Host VMs for ECS, EKS, EC2, GCE, and Azure.. Both serve the Container Security market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.