Akamai Adaptive Media Delivery vs Blaze DDoS Protection: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Akamai Adaptive Media Delivery

Mid-market and enterprise teams streaming video at scale need Akamai Adaptive Media Delivery for its 100% availability SLA and edge-native content control, which eliminates the operational overhead of managing origin failover and geographic access policies yourself. The platform's serverless edge compute and intelligent caching stack mean you're not paying for unused capacity or dealing with origin overload during traffic spikes. Skip this if your primary concern is DDoS mitigation rather than delivery reliability; Akamai excels at keeping streams live, not at stopping volumetric attacks before they reach your edge.

Blaze DDoS Protection

Mid-market and enterprise teams facing volumetric DDoS attacks need Blaze DDoS Protection for its 80+ Tbps ingestion capacity and sub-millisecond scrubbing latency across 17 global centers, which means attacks don't tank user experience while mitigation runs. The 114 billion daily NetFlow records feed continuous Layer 3 and Layer 4 attack detection without manual tuning, and its command and control takedown capability addresses the operational overhead most teams underestimate. Skip this if your threat model is primarily application-layer attacks; Blaze's strength is volumetric and protocol-based assault, not WAF work.