aircrack-ng vs o365-attack-toolkit: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
aircrack-ng is a free penetration testing tool. o365-attack-toolkit is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teamers validating Wi-Fi security controls need aircrack-ng because it's the fastest open-source tool for cracking WPA/WPA2 handshakes and remains the standard for auditing enterprise wireless deployments. The tool has 7,034 GitHub stars and is actively maintained with support for modern chipsets and attack vectors, making it reliable for consistent reproducible results in test environments. Skip this if your team lacks Linux command-line fluency or needs GUI-driven workflows; aircrack-ng assumes operator competence and won't hold your hand through packet capture workflows.
Penetration testers running Office365 red teams need o365-attack-toolkit because it automates the attack chains most frequently missed in manual testing: password spraying against MFA-less accounts, token theft via API manipulation, and lateral movement through shared mailbox permissions. The 1,116 GitHub stars and active maintenance reflect real adoption by practitioners who've replaced custom scripts with this toolkit. Skip it if your scope is shallow phishing simulations or if your client's O365 tenant has conditional access properly configured; the toolkit assumes weak or absent policy controls that limit its value in mature environments.
