Aikido Container Image Scanning vs Clair: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Container Image Scanning is a commercial container security tool by Aikido Security. Clair is a free container security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best container security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Aikido Container Image Scanning
Teams shipping containers at scale across multiple registries need Aikido Container Image Scanning because its reachability analysis cuts false positives by actually determining which CVEs can execute in your environment, not just flagging every known vulnerability. The tool scans Kubernetes workloads directly and integrates with 12 major registries including ECR, GCR, and Artifactory, with AutoFix generating pull requests to patch real risks automatically. Skip this if your organization runs fewer than 50 container images monthly or needs runtime threat detection alongside build-time scanning; Aikido stops at the image layer and doesn't monitor what happens after deployment.
Development teams shipping containers through CI/CD pipelines should start with Clair because it catches known vulnerabilities at build time before they reach production, and the free, open source model means zero licensing friction for catching this at scale. With 10,942 GitHub stars and deep integration into container registries via API indexing, Clair is battle-tested in high-volume scanning workflows. Skip it if you need runtime threat detection or vulnerability prioritization based on exploitability; Clair is static analysis only, which means it flags everything in the database regardless of whether the vulnerability actually matters for your application.
