Aikido Attack vs xsshunter: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. xsshunter is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Penetration testers and security researchers running frequent XSS assessments will get immediate value from xsshunter because it eliminates the dependency on the external XSSHunter.com service; you get payload generation, exploitation tracking, and callback collection entirely self-hosted. The 1,532 GitHub stars indicate solid adoption within the pentest community and suggest the codebase stays reasonably maintained. Skip this if your team needs a polished commercial interface or support for injection types beyond XSS; xsshunter is a specialist tool that does one thing well and stays out of your way.
