Aikido Attack vs SharpPrinter: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. SharpPrinter is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Penetration testers and red teamers doing internal network reconnaissance will find SharpPrinter valuable for fast printer enumeration without the noise of broader asset discovery tools. The tool is free and carries 168 GitHub stars from active use in real engagements, making it a low-friction addition to your recon workflow. Skip this if you need printer management across your entire estate or compliance reporting; SharpPrinter is built for offensive operators, not IT asset inventory.
