Aikido Attack vs PEDA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. PEDA is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Penetration testers and security researchers doing manual exploit development on Linux will find PEDA indispensable for speeding up low-level binary analysis; the 6,111 GitHub stars reflect years of active use in red teams who've standardized on GDB workflows. The tool's colorized output and exploit-specific commands cut analysis time significantly compared to raw GDB, particularly for stack overflow and format string research. Skip PEDA if your team relies primarily on Windows binaries or needs a graphical debugger; it's a command-line power tool for practitioners who already speak GDB fluently.
