Aikido Attack vs metahttp: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. metahttp is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Penetration testers doing XXE discovery in scope-constrained engagements will find metahttp useful for its laser focus: it's a lightweight bash script that hunts HTTP resources through XML external entity injection without the overhead of full-stack scanners. The 38 GitHub stars and free pricing reflect honest adoption limits; this is a specialized tool, not a platform. Skip it if you need post-exploitation capabilities or are scanning environments where you can't inject XXE payloads; metahttp does one job and doesn't pretend otherwise.
