Aikido Attack vs Ground Control: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. Ground Control is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
AppSec teams hunting SSRF, blind XSS, and XXE vulnerabilities will move faster with Ground Control's purpose-built debugging scripts than with generic burp extensions or manual payload crafting. The 549 GitHub stars and free pricing mean you're getting battle-tested payloads from practitioners who've actually debugged these vulnerabilities in production systems. Skip this if you need a full penetration testing platform; Ground Control is a specialist's toolkit, not a framework replacement.
