Aikido Attack vs ghauri: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. ghauri is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Penetration testers running manual SQL injection assessments will find Ghauri's automated detection and exploitation significantly faster than sqlmap, particularly against WAF-protected targets; the 3,670 GitHub stars reflect active community validation of its evasion techniques. The tool's cross-platform support means you can operate from Windows, macOS, or Linux without forking your workflow. Skip this if your team needs a point-and-click UI or integration with broader vulnerability management platforms; Ghauri is command-line only and stays narrowly focused on SQLi exploitation.
