Aikido Attack vs Feroxbuster: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. Feroxbuster is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Penetration testers who need fast recursive directory enumeration on tight timelines will ship Feroxbuster as their primary scout tool; it outpaces Gobuster on speed and handles redirects cleanly without slowing down. The 6,900+ GitHub stars reflect real adoption among red teamers who've standardized on it across engagements. Skip this if you need a Swiss Army knife,Feroxbuster does one job and ignores wordlist fuzzing, interactive filtering, and the reporting depth that makes other tools palatable to compliance stakeholders.
