Aikido Attack vs Caido: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. Caido is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Solo penetration testers and small AppSec teams will move faster with Caido because it strips away the UI bloat that slows down manual web testing; you get request interception, fuzzing, and scanning without the enterprise overhead that makes Burp Suite feel like piloting a cargo ship. The free pricing eliminates procurement friction entirely, which matters when you're justifying tooling spend to finance. Skip this if you need SAST integration, collaborative workspace management for large teams, or NIST Respond capabilities like automated remediation workflows; Caido is built for hands-on auditing, not orchestrated enterprise remediation.
