Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Agilicus is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Agilicus. CyberHive Connect is a commercial zero trust network access tool by CyberHive. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best zero trust network access fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Teams protecting OT and ICS environments without the luxury of deploying agents will find Agilicus solves a real problem: clientless zero trust access to PLCs, HMIs, and SCADA systems that can't run traditional security software. The no-inbound-ports architecture means your critical infrastructure never exposes attack surface to the internet, and support for federated identity providers lets you enforce MFA across resources that typically have none. Skip this if your primary concern is securing standard IT applications and desktops; plenty of lighter-weight ZTNA platforms handle that use case better and cheaper.
Enterprise and mid-market security teams operating in degraded network conditions, satellite links, or low-power IoT environments will get the most from CyberHive Connect because it handles over 90% packet loss while maintaining sub-2ms reconnect times, a gap no standard VPN or zero-trust platform addresses. The zero-trust architecture with no open ports and post-quantum cryptography covers both PR.AA and PR.IR under NIST CSF 2.0, protecting you against both today's access threats and tomorrow's quantum decryption risk. Skip this if your primary need is managing access to on-premises Windows domain controllers or hybrid environments with heavy legacy infrastructure; CyberHive's strength is in cloud-native and disconnected-by-design networks.
Clientless ZTNA platform for secure access to apps, OT, and ICS resources.
Zero-trust, post-quantum secure connectivity for mission-critical environments.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Agilicus vs CyberHive Connect for your zero trust network access needs.
Agilicus: Clientless ZTNA platform for secure access to apps, OT, and ICS resources. built by Agilicus. Core capabilities include Clientless, agentless secure access to applications, desktops, shares, and OT resources, Multi-factor authentication (MFA) enforcement across all resource types, Single sign-on (SSO) via federated identity providers..
CyberHive Connect: Zero-trust, post-quantum secure connectivity for mission-critical environments. built by CyberHive. Core capabilities include Post-quantum (quantum-safe) cryptography, Zero-trust architecture with no open ports, Secure connectivity over satellite, mobile, and radio links..
Both serve the Zero Trust Network Access market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Agilicus differentiates with Clientless, agentless secure access to applications, desktops, shares, and OT resources, Multi-factor authentication (MFA) enforcement across all resource types, Single sign-on (SSO) via federated identity providers. CyberHive Connect differentiates with Post-quantum (quantum-safe) cryptography, Zero-trust architecture with no open ports, Secure connectivity over satellite, mobile, and radio links.
Agilicus is developed by Agilicus. CyberHive Connect is developed by CyberHive. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Agilicus integrates with Azure Active Directory, Google, Apple, Okta, Microsoft. CyberHive Connect integrates with Microsoft 365, Microsoft Teams, SharePoint. Check integration compatibility with your existing security stack before deciding.
Agilicus and CyberHive Connect serve similar Zero Trust Network Access use cases: both are Zero Trust Network Access tools, both cover ZTNA, Remote Access. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox