AgileBlue M365 Security vs Grip SSPM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AgileBlue M365 Security: Continuous M365 security monitoring for misconfigurations and risks. built by AgileBlue. Core capabilities include Continuous monitoring of M365 environment for misconfigurations, Coverage of Entra ID, Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, Defender, and Power Platform, Automated scanning aligned with Microsoft and CISA best practices..

Grip SSPM: SSPM platform for detecting & remediating SaaS misconfigurations and risks. built by Grip Security. Core capabilities include Continuous detection of misconfigurations across SaaS and IaaS tenants, Detection of sanctioned, unsanctioned, and shadow IT SaaS applications, Configuration drift detection with alerts when deviating from security baselines..

Both serve the Cloud Security Posture Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

AgileBlue M365 Security differentiates with Continuous monitoring of M365 environment for misconfigurations, Coverage of Entra ID, Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, Defender, and Power Platform, Automated scanning aligned with Microsoft and CISA best practices. Grip SSPM differentiates with Continuous detection of misconfigurations across SaaS and IaaS tenants, Detection of sanctioned, unsanctioned, and shadow IT SaaS applications, Configuration drift detection with alerts when deviating from security baselines.

AgileBlue M365 Security is developed by AgileBlue. Grip SSPM is developed by Grip Security. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

AgileBlue M365 Security and Grip SSPM serve similar Cloud Security Posture Management use cases: both are Cloud Security Posture Management tools, both cover Misconfiguration. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.