AgileBlue M365 Security vs Fluid Attacks CSPM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AgileBlue M365 Security

Teams managing Microsoft 365 security across multiple workloads will find AgileBlue M365 Security worthwhile because it actually catches misconfigurations that break Exchange, Teams, and SharePoint at once instead of requiring separate tools. Continuous monitoring aligned with Microsoft and CISA baselines covers Entra ID through Power Platform, and the risk-based prioritization means you're not drowning in false positives. Skip this if your organization needs detection and response for active threats; AgileBlue prioritizes configuration drift and compliance posture, not incident hunting.

Fluid Attacks CSPM

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing multi-cloud infrastructure across AWS, Azure, and GCP should pick Fluid Attacks CSPM for its reattack verification capability, which actually validates that fixes work instead of just flagging misconfigurations. The AI-assisted remediation with custom fix options and pentester support addresses the gap most teams face in ID.RA Risk Assessment, turning vulnerability discovery into closure. Skip this if your organization needs a single platform covering code scanning, container security, and cloud posture in one pane; Fluid Attacks is deliberately cloud-posture focused.