AgileBlue M365 Security vs Entersoft Managed Cloud Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AgileBlue M365 Security

Teams managing Microsoft 365 security across multiple workloads will find AgileBlue M365 Security worthwhile because it actually catches misconfigurations that break Exchange, Teams, and SharePoint at once instead of requiring separate tools. Continuous monitoring aligned with Microsoft and CISA baselines covers Entra ID through Power Platform, and the risk-based prioritization means you're not drowning in false positives. Skip this if your organization needs detection and response for active threats; AgileBlue prioritizes configuration drift and compliance posture, not incident hunting.

Entersoft Managed Cloud Security

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing multi-cloud sprawl across AWS, Azure, and GCP should choose Entersoft Managed Cloud Security for its architecture-first approach; most CSPM tools start with configuration drift, but Entersoft reviews your design before it breaks. The vendor holds ISO 27017 and 27018 certifications specifically for cloud environments, and covers six major compliance frameworks including NIST CSPM. Skip this if you need managed detection and response layered on top of posture management; Entersoft prioritizes the ID and PR functions of NIST CSF 2.0 but leaves the continuous monitoring and response piece to your existing SOC.