AgileBlue M365 Security vs Dow Jones Hammer: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
AgileBlue M365 Security is a commercial cloud security posture management tool by AgileBlue. Dow Jones Hammer is a free cloud security posture management tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cloud security posture management fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Teams managing Microsoft 365 security across multiple workloads will find AgileBlue M365 Security worthwhile because it actually catches misconfigurations that break Exchange, Teams, and SharePoint at once instead of requiring separate tools. Continuous monitoring aligned with Microsoft and CISA baselines covers Entra ID through Power Platform, and the risk-based prioritization means you're not drowning in false positives. Skip this if your organization needs detection and response for active threats; AgileBlue prioritizes configuration drift and compliance posture, not incident hunting.
Teams with AWS-only multi-account sprawl who need fast remediation without vendor lock-in should start with Dow Jones Hammer; it's free, which means you can validate misconfig detection across hundreds of instances before committing budget elsewhere. The 448 GitHub stars and open-source model give you transparency into what the tool actually checks and the option to fork it if Dow Jones stops maintaining it. Skip this if your environment is multi-cloud or if you need CIEM and identity governance layered in; Hammer stays disciplined around infrastructure misconfiguration and doesn't pretend to be a platform.
