AggressiveProxy vs tryharder: 2026 Comparison
AggressiveProxy is a free offensive security tool. tryharder is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers running CobaltStrike-heavy engagements should use AggressiveProxy to skip manual proxy enumeration and jump straight to shellcode generation. The tool cuts reconnaissance time on internal network reconnaissance because it automates the mapping of proxy configs that would otherwise require hours of manual PowerShell scripting. Skip this if you're doing purple team exercises or need to test detection of proxy-aware payloads; AggressiveProxy is offense-only and doesn't help you see what your blue team actually catches.
Red teamers and penetration testers running Sliver or custom shellcode payloads will get the most from tryharder because its staged loader actually evades common memory inspection hooks that off-the-shelf loaders fail against. The 97 GitHub stars and active maintenance suggest real operators are shipping this in engagements, which is more meaningful than a vendor benchmark here. Skip this if your team needs post-exploitation frameworks or C2 infrastructure; tryharder does one thing, loader evasion, and stops there.
