aDolus SBOM Creation / FACT Platform vs Sonatype Lifecycle: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

aDolus SBOM Creation / FACT Platform

Mid-market and enterprise teams tasked with demonstrating supply chain compliance will find aDolus SBOM Creation / FACT Platform valuable for one reason: it generates NTIA-compliant SBOMs from binaries and legacy code without requiring source access, which solves the real problem of inherited software that most competitors skip over. The platform supports multiple formats (SPDX, CycloneDX, SWID) and directly addresses regulatory demands under EO 14028 and NERC CIP-013, eliminating the manual SBOM work that drains compliance teams. This is less suited for organizations seeking deep vulnerability scoring or threat hunting; aDolus owns the "generate what regulators want" problem, not the "hunt what's dangerous in it" problem.

Sonatype Lifecycle

Development teams managing sprawling open source dependencies across multiple languages will see immediate value from Sonatype Lifecycle's automated Golden Pull Requests, which patch vulnerabilities without breaking builds, a capability most SCA tools leave to manual remediation. The reachability analysis engine cuts through noise by prioritizing only exploitable components, and coverage of 20+ package managers including Maven, npm, PyPI, and Docker means you're not swapping tools between microservices and container images. Skip this if your organization has minimal open source use or treats vulnerability management as a compliance checkbox rather than a continuous engineering problem; the policy engine and waiver workflows assume active developer engagement.