aDolus SBOM Creation / FACT Platform vs Raven Runtime SCA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

aDolus SBOM Creation / FACT Platform

Mid-market and enterprise teams tasked with demonstrating supply chain compliance will find aDolus SBOM Creation / FACT Platform valuable for one reason: it generates NTIA-compliant SBOMs from binaries and legacy code without requiring source access, which solves the real problem of inherited software that most competitors skip over. The platform supports multiple formats (SPDX, CycloneDX, SWID) and directly addresses regulatory demands under EO 14028 and NERC CIP-013, eliminating the manual SBOM work that drains compliance teams. This is less suited for organizations seeking deep vulnerability scoring or threat hunting; aDolus owns the "generate what regulators want" problem, not the "hunt what's dangerous in it" problem.

Raven Runtime SCA

Teams running polyglot cloud applications who are drowning in open-source vulnerability noise should start with Raven Runtime SCA; its CPU-level reachability analysis actually tells you which CVEs can execute, not just which ones exist in your dependencies. The runtime prioritization cuts triage work by eliminating the 80% of vulnerabilities your code never touches, and multi-language support across Python, Java, Go, and seven others means you're not swapping tools between services. Skip this if your supply chain risk strategy lives entirely in pre-deployment scanning or if you need SBOM generation to be your primary control; Raven assumes you're already past the build gate and need to know what's actually exploitable in production.