aDolus FACT - Malware Detection vs go-yara: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

aDolus FACT - Malware Detection

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing software supply chains will get the most from aDolus FACT because it consolidates multiple antivirus engines and YARA rules into a single malware detection workflow, catching threats that isolated scanners miss. The tool maps component relationships to identify hidden infection paths, and covers NIST GV.SC (supply chain risk management) and DE.AE (adverse event analysis) with actual depth rather than surface-level compliance. Skip this if you need post-infection response or threat hunting; FACT stops at detection and doesn't help you understand how malware moved through your network after the fact.

go-yara

Incident response teams and forensics analysts who need to hunt malware signatures across disk images, memory dumps, and live systems will find go-yara valuable for its speed and portability; the Go implementation compiles to native binaries that run on any platform without runtime dependencies, which matters when you're working across Windows, Linux, and macOS infrastructure. With 387 GitHub stars and active maintenance, it's battle-tested enough for production hunts, though you're getting a language binding rather than a complete investigation platform. Skip this if your team needs a GUI-driven forensics suite or expects pre-built detection rules; go-yara is for practitioners who write their own YARA signatures and integrate them into custom automation.