Adaptive Identity Proofing vs OneSpan Sign: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Adaptive Identity Proofing

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing high-friction signup flows will get the most from Adaptive Identity Proofing, since its risk-based workflows let you demand proof only when signals warrant it rather than gate every user. The SignalPrint tracking system and government document verification cover PR.AA identity management rigorously, reducing both fraud and abandonment. Skip this if you need passwordless authentication or session management bundled in; Verosint is focused narrowly on the proofing moment itself.

OneSpan Sign

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing regulated signing workflows will find real value in OneSpan Sign's layered ID verification, particularly the machine learning-backed government photo ID analysis paired with biometric liveness detection that catches synthetic identity fraud at the point of signing. The platform maps directly to NIST PR.AA identity management controls and supports eIDAS-qualified signatures for EU compliance, which matters if your audit scope touches regulated transactions. Skip this if you need embedded signing as a secondary feature within a broader document platform; OneSpan Sign is purpose-built for high-friction identity verification and will feel like overkill if you're just collecting signatures on internal forms.