Adaptive Identity Proofing vs Mitek IDLive Doc: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Adaptive Identity Proofing

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing high-friction signup flows will get the most from Adaptive Identity Proofing, since its risk-based workflows let you demand proof only when signals warrant it rather than gate every user. The SignalPrint tracking system and government document verification cover PR.AA identity management rigorously, reducing both fraud and abandonment. Skip this if you need passwordless authentication or session management bundled in; Verosint is focused narrowly on the proofing moment itself.

Mitek IDLive Doc

Startups and SMBs handling high-volume KYC workflows will get the most from Mitek IDLive Doc because it detects screen replay and printed ID attacks without asking users to perform liveness gestures, cutting friction while blocking the spoofing methods that actually work at scale. Single API call integration means you're live in days, not weeks, and the document-agnostic model means you don't retrain when your customer base shifts geographies. Skip this if your primary concern is preventing insider document fraud or if you need post-verification recovery playbooks; Mitek prioritizes detection at the front door, not what happens after a bad actor slips through.