Adaptive Control Center vs Haiku Admin Panel: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Adaptive Control Center

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in phishing click rates will see faster behavior change with Adaptive Control Center's micro-learning modules paired with immediate phishing and deepfake simulations, because people retain what hits them fast and repeatedly. The platform handles NIST PR.AT awareness training requirements directly through role-based access control and automated employee syncing, reducing manual enrollment overhead. Skip this if your organization needs to track post-breach incident response or remediation workflows; Adaptive Control Center is training-first, not incident-response integrated.

Haiku Admin Panel

Security leaders in mid-market and enterprise organizations need Haiku Admin Panel if their training compliance reports are scattered across spreadsheets and their board presentations lack proof that employees actually retain security skills. The platform's NIST CSF 2.0 alignment to PR.AT (Awareness and Training) and GV.RR (Roles and Responsibilities) means you're mapping individual competency data directly to regulatory audit trails, not just logging completion counts. Skip this if your organization has fewer than 200 employees or relies heavily on instructor-led training; Haiku's strength is in scaled, repeatable assessment workflows that smaller teams don't yet need.