Q: Is Abnormal Security Security Posture Management a good alternative to Circumvent?

Abnormal Security Security Posture Management and Circumvent serve similar Cloud Security Posture Management use cases: both are Cloud Security Posture Management tools, both cover Misconfiguration. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Question 1

What is the difference between Abnormal Security Security Posture Management vs Circumvent?

Accepted Answer

**Abnormal Security Security Posture Management**: Monitors and remediates Microsoft 365 email security misconfigurations. built by Abnormal Security. Core capabilities include Continuous monitoring of Microsoft 365 security posture, Detection of dormant admin accounts and overly permissive apps, CIS Benchmark comparison and configuration drift detection..

**Circumvent**: Cloud security platform for misconfiguration remediation and exposure mgmt. built by Circumvent. Core capabilities include Alert correlation across cloud-native and third-party security tools, Asset relationship mapping and analysis, Risk prioritization with business context..

Both serve the Cloud Security Posture Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Question 2

What features do Abnormal Security Security Posture Management vs Circumvent offer?

Accepted Answer

**Abnormal Security Security Posture Management** differentiates with Continuous monitoring of Microsoft 365 security posture, Detection of dormant admin accounts and overly permissive apps, CIS Benchmark comparison and configuration drift detection. **Circumvent** differentiates with Alert correlation across cloud-native and third-party security tools, Asset relationship mapping and analysis, Risk prioritization with business context.

Question 3

Who makes Abnormal Security Security Posture Management vs Circumvent?

Accepted Answer

**Abnormal Security Security Posture Management** is developed by Abnormal Security. **Circumvent** is developed by Circumvent. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.