689Cloud SecureDrive vs SecurelyShare Data Vault: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

689Cloud SecureDrive

Mid-market and enterprise teams shipping sensitive documents outside the firewall need 689Cloud SecureDrive for post-download revocation; it kills access to files already on someone's laptop, which standard cloud sharing cannot do. The platform maps cleanly to NIST PR.DS and PR.AA, with document-level tracking and role-based permissions that satisfy audit trails without requiring IT to babysit every share. Skip this if your primary concern is detecting exfiltration rather than preventing it; 689Cloud assumes the adversary already has the file and focuses on neutralizing its value instead.

SecurelyShare Data Vault

Mid-market and enterprise teams handling regulated data with strict sharing workflows should evaluate SecurelyShare Data Vault for its file-level encryption with unique keys per document and revocable access controls; the combination prevents both accidental exposure and insider misuse at the point of transfer. NIST PR.DS and PR.AA coverage is solid, with MFA, SSO, and real-time audit trails covering the core access and monitoring requirements. Skip this if your primary need is data discovery or classification across data lakes; SecurelyShare excels at controlling what's already identified and ready to share, not finding it in the first place.