CyberSmart Active Protect for Mobile vs Zimperium MTD: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CyberSmart Active Protect for Mobile

Startups and SMBs with BYOD programs should pick CyberSmart Active Protect for Mobile because it runs continuous vulnerability scans on employee devices without touching personal data, a rare combination that actually passes privacy review. The tool covers NIST asset management and continuous monitoring (DE.CM) across both iOS and Android through native app deployment, with policy distribution and read receipts built in so you know what's actually enforced. Skip this if you need deep integration with enterprise UEM platforms beyond MDM compatibility, or if your threat model includes sophisticated nation-state actors; the focus here is misconfigurations and malicious apps, not advanced persistent intrusion.

Zimperium MTD

Enterprise and mid-market security teams with strict federal compliance requirements should pick Zimperium MTD for its FedRAMP authorization and on-device detection architecture that keeps sensitive mobile threat data off the cloud entirely. The hybrid deployment model and support for multiple UEM platforms in one console eliminates the common friction point of managing separate mobile security stacks across your endpoint infrastructure. Not the right fit if your organization needs thick forensics and incident reconstruction; Zimperium prioritizes continuous detection over post-incident analysis, so your SOC will see threats flagged faster than you'll be able to trace their origin.