ZAMA vs Themis: 2026 Comparison
ZAMA is a free data masking tool. Themis is a free data masking tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best data masking fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Developers building privacy-critical applications on public blockchains or untrusted infrastructure need fhEVM Coprocessor because it's the only open-source tool that lets you perform computations on encrypted data without decrypting it first, eliminating the exposure window entirely. The library supports arbitrary smart contract logic through Fully Homomorphic Encryption, meaning your data stays encrypted end-to-end in NIST Protect and Govern functions. Skip this if your team lacks cryptography expertise or you need a point-and-click masking tool for legacy databases; fhEVM requires developers to architect around encrypted computation from the ground up, not bolt encryption onto existing systems.
Development teams building applications that handle sensitive authentication data or need encryption primitives without vendor lock-in should start with Themis. It's open-source with 1,954 GitHub stars and provides cryptographic services across authentication, storage, and messaging in a single library, letting you avoid piecing together multiple dependencies. The tradeoff: Themis is a low-level building block, not a managed data masking platform; it requires engineering effort to integrate and won't give you the policy engine or compliance reporting that off-the-shelf data masking tools provide.
