Fortinet FortiClient vs ThreatLocker Storage Control: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Fortinet FortiClient: Unified endpoint agent providing ZTNA, VPN, EPP, and fabric integration. built by Fortinet. Core capabilities include Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), VPN-encrypted tunnels, AI-based next-generation antivirus (NGAV)..

ThreatLocker Storage Control: Policy-driven storage device access control for USB, network, and local drives. built by threatlocker. Core capabilities include Policy-driven storage device access control, Granular policies based on user, time, application, device serial number, vendor, and file type, Centralized audit logging of all file access on USB, network, and local drives..

Both serve the Endpoint Protection Platform market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Fortinet FortiClient differentiates with Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), VPN-encrypted tunnels, AI-based next-generation antivirus (NGAV). ThreatLocker Storage Control differentiates with Policy-driven storage device access control, Granular policies based on user, time, application, device serial number, vendor, and file type, Centralized audit logging of all file access on USB, network, and local drives.

Fortinet FortiClient is developed by Fortinet. ThreatLocker Storage Control is developed by threatlocker. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Fortinet FortiClient and ThreatLocker Storage Control serve similar Endpoint Protection Platform use cases: both are Endpoint Protection Platform tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.