Shield-IoT ShieldEdge vs Sternum Continuous Monitoring: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Shield-IoT ShieldEdge

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing sprawling IoT/OT networks without the budget for device-level agents should start with ShieldEdge; its agentless TCP/IP traffic analysis discovers and profiles edge devices with zero installation friction. The platform covers the full NIST Identify-to-Detect chain, including continuous asset monitoring and AI-driven anomaly detection across 100+ threat feeds, with automated compliance reporting for GDPR, NIST 2.0, and IEC 62443. Skip this if your priority is threat response and remediation; ShieldEdge excels at visibility and detection but offers less depth in automated containment than tools with tighter firewall or segmentation integration.

Sternum Continuous Monitoring

Mid-market and enterprise teams monitoring IoT and embedded device fleets should evaluate Sternum Continuous Monitoring for its lightweight SDK and multivariate anomaly detection, which catch memory leaks and firmware anomalies before they reach production. The platform covers DE.CM (continuous monitoring) and ID.AM (asset management) under NIST CSF 2.0, giving you real-time device observability across firmware versions and connectivity states without the overhead of traditional agents. Skip this if your priority is post-incident forensics or integration with broader SOC workflows; Sternum is built for early detection of device-level issues, not incident response.