Ipsumdump vs Stenographer: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Ipsumdump is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Stenographer is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Network forensics teams doing post-incident packet analysis will find Ipsumdump's strength in manual tcpdump parsing; it converts raw binary captures into readable ASCII summaries faster than hand-decoding, which matters when you're triaging thousands of packets on a tight timeline. The tool is free and has been stable enough to accumulate 40 GitHub stars from practitioners who actually use it. Skip this if you need automated threat detection or real-time packet inspection; Ipsumdump is a parsing utility for humans reviewing historical traffic, not a sensor.
Security teams doing incident response and threat hunting need Stenographer for one reason: it captures full packets at line rate without dropping traffic, which means you actually have the forensic record when you need it. A 1,800-star GitHub project with active use in production environments shows it handles sustained high-volume capture on modest hardware. Skip this if your team expects a GUI, query language, or built-in analytics; Stenographer is a capture engine, not an analysis platform, and you'll need separate tools to make sense of the pcap output.
