CybrHawk SOC-as-a-Service vs SOC Gestionado: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CybrHawk SOC-as-a-Service

Mid-market and SMB security teams without in-house SOC capacity should evaluate CybrHawk SOC-as-a-Service for its playbook-driven incident response; most managed SOC vendors stop at alert generation, but this one extends into remediation automation. The platform covers NIST RS.MA and RS.MI (incident management and mitigation), which means less time between detection and containment for resource-constrained teams. Skip this if you need heavy forensics support or have enterprise-scale requirements demanding custom integrations; the 16-person vendor will feel thin on both fronts.

SOC Gestionado

Mid-market and SMB teams in Spain and EU-regulated markets should consider SOC Gestionado if you need a managed SOC that actually handles incident response coordination instead of just forwarding alerts. The service covers continuous monitoring across endpoints, servers, networks, and cloud with compliance pre-built for ENS, ISO 27001, and RGPD, so you're not retrofitting controls later. The 24x7 option with threat intelligence integration covers your detection and analysis gaps; just know this prioritizes detection and incident management over deep forensics capabilities, so larger enterprises with complex investigation workflows may find the analytical depth lacking.