Site Blindado WAF vs Array Networks Web Application Firewall: 2026 Comparison

Site Blindado WAF

SMB and mid-market e-commerce operators need Site Blindado WAF primarily for its integrated CDN, which collapses two vendor relationships into one contract and cuts latency while blocking attacks at the edge. The platform covers core attack vectors,SQL injection, XSS, brute force, malicious bots,with behavioral learning that reduces false positives without requiring constant tuning. Skip this if you're enterprise-scale and need SIEM integration, advanced API threat modeling, or SLA guarantees from a vendor with established North American support; Site Blindado's 15-person team and Brazil headquarters mean you're trading brand recognition for pricing and regional relevance.

Array Networks Web Application Firewall

Mid-market and enterprise security teams protecting APIs alongside traditional web apps will get the most from Array Networks Web Application Firewall, especially if you're running hybrid cloud and need zero-day blocking without waiting for signature updates. The platform's automatic threat detection across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud plus on-premises deployments covers three NIST CSF 2.0 functions,infrastructure resilience, platform security, and continuous monitoring,which means you're not sacrificing visibility for prevention. Skip this if your primary concern is post-breach forensics; Array Networks prioritizes blocking over investigation, so buyers needing deep incident response integration should look elsewhere.