Didit AML Screening vs Signicat Identity Proofing: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Didit AML Screening

Compliance teams at SMBs and mid-market firms processing high volumes of customer onboarding will get the most from Didit AML Screening because it charges per-use with no monthly minimums, making variable screening costs proportional to actual risk instead of seat licenses. The tool screens against 1000+ global watchlists daily with automated re-screening and webhook alerts, so your compliance staff reviews only material changes rather than static data. Skip this if you need adverse media analysis as a primary function; Didit includes it but positions screening against sanctions and PEP lists as the core strength.

Signicat Identity Proofing

Mid-market and enterprise fintechs moving fast on regulated onboarding will appreciate Signicat Identity Proofing because it handles 35+ identity methods across geographies without forcing you to stitch together five different vendors. The platform covers both NIST PR.AA (identity management) and GV.SC (supply chain risk) requirements out of the box, and the video-based biometric verification actually works across borderless customer bases where traditional document-only checks fail. This isn't the tool for companies that need identity verification as a bolt-on to a larger IAM platform; Signicat is purpose-built for KYC/AML compliance workflows, which means you're either solving that problem or you're overpaying.