Nagomi Control vs Sequretek Percept CTEM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Nagomi Control

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in vulnerability noise will find Nagomi Control's real value in its Exposure Lens engine, which actually validates whether your controls are working before you waste time patching. The platform covers NIST asset management, risk assessment, and continuous monitoring exceptionally well, with live TTP correlation that turns threat intelligence into decisions rather than dashboards. Skip this if your organization lacks the operational maturity to act on contextual prioritization; Nagomi Control assumes you can move fast on what matters most, not that you need hand-holding through remediation.

Sequretek Percept CTEM

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in asset sprawl across hybrid infrastructure will find value in Percept CTEM's AI-driven risk ranking, which cuts through noise by surfacing what actually matters for your threat model instead of flooding you with every CVE match. The platform covers asset discovery, continuous monitoring, and remediation integration with XDR and SIEM tools, hitting four key NIST CSF 2.0 functions including the often-neglected Asset Management and Risk Assessment areas. Skip this if your team needs deep forensic capabilities or incident response automation; Percept is built for exposure visibility and prioritization, not post-breach investigation.