Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
SecurelyShare for Email is a commercial email encryption tool by SecurelyShare. Virtru Email Encryption is a commercial email encryption tool by Virtru. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best email encryption fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams that need encryption without forcing end-users through client installation will find SecurelyShare for Email cuts through adoption friction; the agentless architecture means you encrypt at the gateway while recipients access messages through their existing email client. Policy-based automation handles both the encryption enforcement and the audit trail compliance that NIST PR.DS and GV.PO require. Skip this if your organization relies on external recipients who refuse web portal workflows or if you need encryption to cover non-email channels; SecurelyShare stays focused on email.
Mid-market and enterprise teams that need email encryption without forcing users through clunky workflows should start with Virtru Email Encryption. The one-click Gmail and Outlook plugin adoption rate beats password-protected PDFs by orders of magnitude, and its data revocation capability,pulling back sent emails after delivery,addresses the real compliance gap competitors ignore. Skip this if your organization treats email encryption as a compliance checkbox rather than a security control; Virtru's granular access controls and audit trails assume you'll actually manage who sees what, not just encrypt and forget.
End-to-end email encryption solution with centralized policy management
End-to-end email encryption for Gmail and Outlook with access controls
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
Recent Reviews
Very easy to setup and start utilizing right away
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing SecurelyShare for Email vs Virtru Email Encryption for your email encryption needs.
SecurelyShare for Email: End-to-end email encryption solution with centralized policy management. built by SecurelyShare. Core capabilities include End-to-end email encryption without client installation, Integration with anti-spam, anti-virus, DLP, and archiving systems, Centralized policy-based encryption management..
Virtru Email Encryption: End-to-end email encryption for Gmail and Outlook with access controls. built by Virtru. Core capabilities include End-to-end encryption for email messages and attachments, One-click encryption plugin for Gmail and Outlook, Granular access controls including forwarding disable and expiration dates..
Both serve the Email Encryption market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
SecurelyShare for Email differentiates with End-to-end email encryption without client installation, Integration with anti-spam, anti-virus, DLP, and archiving systems, Centralized policy-based encryption management. Virtru Email Encryption differentiates with End-to-end encryption for email messages and attachments, One-click encryption plugin for Gmail and Outlook, Granular access controls including forwarding disable and expiration dates.
SecurelyShare for Email is developed by SecurelyShare. Virtru Email Encryption is developed by Virtru. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
SecurelyShare for Email and Virtru Email Encryption serve similar Email Encryption use cases: both are Email Encryption tools, both cover Encryption. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox