ESET Secure Authentication vs Secfense UASB: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

ESET Secure Authentication

SMB and mid-market IT teams managing hybrid infrastructure will find ESET Secure Authentication's mobile-first push authentication cuts password fatigue without requiring a security overhaul; the biometric support and on-premises deployment option mean you're not forced to choose between usability and control. NIST PR.AA coverage confirms the core access control story. Skip this if you need deep cloud-native IAM orchestration or plan to retire all hardware tokens immediately; ESET's strength is protecting legacy VPN and web app access, not replacing your identity fabric.

Secfense UASB

Security teams managing legacy web applications without development resources will get the most from Secfense UASB because it bolts MFA onto any app in minutes without touching code. The reverse proxy deployment learns application traffic patterns automatically and enforces organization-wide authentication policy, meaning you skip the six-month developer queue that kills most MFA rollouts. Skip this if your infrastructure is API-first or you need deep integrations with your identity provider; Secfense works best as a perimeter layer for traditional web apps that haven't been touched in years.